You are here
Projects Updates for Increase Recycling through the WTS
Search tips:
- This form will search for words in the title OR the description. If you would like to search for the same term(s) across both the title and description, enter the same search term(s) in both fields.
- This form will search for any of the words you enter in a field, not the exact phrase you enter. If you would like to search for an exact phrase, put double quotes (") around the phrase. For example, if you search for Bike Path you will get results containing either the word Bike OR the word Path, but if you search for "Bike Path" you will get results containing the exact phrase Bike Path.
Pages
- Associated Project(s):
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):Summer zero waste intern tour on Tuesday, June 6, 2023
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):Group of sustainable design students, led by Karin Hodgin Jones on Wednesday, April 26
can you please share that slide showing the waste transfer mural wall?
Associated Project(s):Hi Daphne,
Please see my request in the subject line.
Also, based on our costs, I’m looking at about $62 a SF. So for a 12’ by 8’ installation, we’re looking at roughly $6,000 total. Given that they will have to install up higher, and the installation of panels might not be directly mounted, but more of a strut system, braced on either side of the metal shed, I’d just go a bit higher to $8000 for an ask.
I ran this past ARC, and we didn’t have any issues with this idea. We just want to be involved with approval. Everything that I talked about this morning seemed good with them.
Thanks!
Brent Lewis
---------------------
Hi Brent,
Thank you for this cost estimate. Please see the attachment for the slide.
Thank you,
DaphneAttached Files:Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):2 students researching waste management
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):Vet med group led by Dr. Gay Miller
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):The Illinois Club
Led by Patricia Cardenas
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):2 students and 2 faculty visiting from Birmingham, UK
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):2 students and 1 staff member
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):Civil & Environmental Engineering 538: Water Control Process II class, led by research scientist Yalin Li
Civil & Environmental Engineering grad student group, led by Lara Diab
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):Codie Sterner, Student Sustainability Committee Coordinator
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):Dr. Michelle Dallmier and Dr. Heidi Lueszler
Parkland Environmental Biology
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):Molly Black, lab manager at Bevier
Student group coordinated by Laney Nielsen
Civil & Environmental Engineering 538: Water Control Process II class, led by research scientist Yalin Li
Student Sustainability Committee group, led by Hongxu Lu
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):Dr. Thomas Johnson
Geology 380
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):For Dr. Hong Lu (individual professor) and a student group coordinated by Aaryaman Patel
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):For University Housing foreman and supervisors
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):For Dr. Jamie Jones
Earth, Society, & Environment 360: Environmental Writing
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):Tour for Parkland College
Waste Transfer Station Tours
Associated Project(s):For student group interested in learning about MRFs.
(Samuel Hurh, student)
Athletics Waste Tracking
Associated Project(s):Below is an email from Daphne regarding waste/energy tracking at Athletics.
Hi Jen,
Yes! I’m attaching the spreadsheet used to generate the graph, as well as the spreadsheets containing the raw data. I’m cc’ing Shreya in this conversation as she has contributed the most to visualizing the waste and recycling data.
For background: Looking at the raw data you will notice that it is separated between frontload and rolloff/swingpan – these are the 3 types of outdoor receptacles we use for landfill and recycling collection (frontload being smallest, swingpan being a little bigger, and rolloff being largest size). They are separated because their collection process is different. Then, we must bring all the data together for metrics like a diversion rate.
Frontload receptacles are lifted, and their contents are dumped into a truck. The frontload receptacle is left in place after, so trucks go around and pick up multiple buildings’ worth of frontload waste (like neighborhood trash trucks). For this reason, we don’t have a perfect understanding of how much waste individually comes from buildings with these receptacles (though the technology does exist for us to eventually understand this better).
Rolloff receptacles are rolled directly onto and off the truck. Some rolloffs have a compactor built within them (State Farm Center, for example). The receptacle is then taken to the Waste Transfer Station, weighed, dumped, and then taken back to its original location.
Swingpan receptacles function just the same as rolloff, the only difference is the smaller size of the receptacle.
I’m attaching a single slide that visualizes the receptacle and accompanying truck, as this is what helped bring it together for me. All three types of receptacles are used for both landfill and recycling collection, it’s just a matter of how much space is outside any given building for a truck to navigate through + how much waste/recycling is expected to be produced from a given building which ultimately determines the type of outdoor receptacle used.
Please let me know if you have any questions!
Thank you,
Daphne