9/17/2021, 2:15 PM

Attendees: Morgan White, Meredith Moore, Stacy Gloss

Summary:

Stacy, Meredith and Morgan met for the first time together since Stacy was appointed and started work on 9/16/2021. The purpose of the meeting is to provide the information and resources needed for Stacy to start working on resilience activities in the scope work. We reviewed Stacy’s job description regarding activities for the next 6 months and related deliverables. See attached job description.

Agreements:  

• Stacy will take the meeting notes from each of these Resilience Work Check-In meetings and put them on the portal for project tracking.
• Stacy will provide updates at the Resilience iCAP team meetings.
• We set up a recurring meeting time for Thursdays from  2 pm – 3 pm.

To-Do’s:

Stacy will re-read the objective in iCAP 2020 PDF about all resilience objectives. Review the resilience theme, scan the project list, and look at project history for specific objectives.

8.1 Check in when needed w/ Lisa Merrifield

8.2 Start with campus contacts. Email Betsy Liggett,  Brent Lewis, & Morgan White and set up a call with Betsy. Betsy is liaison to community green infrastructure.  The objectives are to find out who it is to talk to in Champaign-Urbana-Savoy for off-campus infrastructure locations. Eventually, ask resilience team what information should be included on the iCAP portal map. Note: There’s an Oct 20 conference about the Champaign County storm water partnership.  With this objective, we will ultimately work towards planning a coordinated rainwater mgmt. plan, and what it might look like.

8.3. Review documentation that Kimmy provided as a report on the portal. 

8.4.  Request a call with Ximing to explain the concept behind 8.4 and report back. Further steps may be taken to include whole iSEE management team in a conversation.

8.5.  Review 8.5 Discuss at meeting 2 weeks from now.

8.6.  Morgan will connect Stacy with Sarthak Prasad. Review Vision zero website soon and request a meeting with Sarthak.

8.7.  Review 8.7 Discuss at meeting 2 weeks from now.  Review Current State of the Market, and review files in the box folder that students created about local off sets.

Throughout the summer of 2021, I (Kimmy Chuang, iSEE intern, supervised by Meredith Moore) accomplished the following tasks to further the Environmental Justice Plan. Relevant documents documents attached. 

1. Compile contact information for focus groups

Number and type of contacts were organized into the following:

1. 1. Champaign Neighborhood Associations (16)
   2. Urbana Neighborhood Associations (8)
   3. Community Groups (10)
   4. Government Organizations (13)
   5. Social Justice Groups (8)
   6. Relevant UIUC Advisory Groups/Personnel (12)

Contacts were primarily found through Internet searches. Many of the groups were identified as relevant during Environmental Justice Committee meetings. Where possible or necessary, I’ve included notes and additional links. 

2. Research other EJ plans to draft focus group questions

I drafted possible questions for focus group interviews through what I learned from the following EJ or similar Climate Justice Plans:

City of Providence’s Climate Justice Plan

• First, trained frontline community members in energy democracy through workshops by working with One Square World (equity and sustainability process consultancy). Then, conducted interviews of frontline community members along with citywide survey (survey results here)
• Favorite takeaway: Must fundamentally change the way policies are created and prioritize historically excluded communities. “Zip codes shouldn’t determine your health or economic outcomes.”

Little Village Environmental Justice Organization (LVEJO)

• Also hired consultant to conduct interviews and outreach
• One of their goals was “Base Building” where they have a local base of families, school/community/youth/labor/business leaders as well as strengthening coalitions with other EJ groups in the region
• Warren Lavey has worked with Kimberly Wasserman (LVEJO Director of Organizing)

National City Health and Environmental Justice Element (San Diego County, CA)

• First jurisdiction in California to adopt an EJ element and nationally recognized
• Contains useful definitions of “healthy food supply” and “universal design”
• Similar format to iCAP, ends every objective with “why is this important”
• San Diego county is currently conducting outreach for their county-wide EJ plan with an online survey that can be found here

3. Compile contact information of other municipalities with EJ plans

For the plans I reviewed above, I collected contact information for each municipality into a spreadsheet. The EJ Committee suggested that we reach out to other municipalities that had successfully written EJ plans to inform our process. 

4. Review local engagement efforts to identify salient local environmental issues

Meredith and I’s original goal for the focus groups was to identify 4-5 of the most salient environmental issues in our community that our plan should address.These are issues that have been identified multiple times during EJ Committee discussions or through my research:

1. Flooding (especially in the Garden Hills neighborhood)
2. Toxic waste clean-up (mainly in the 5th and Hill neighborhood)
3. Mahomet Aquifer contamination from Clinton landfill (allowing PCBs/toxic waste disposal)
4. Heating/cooling centers (climate change preparedness)

Through my research, I identified four local public engagement efforts that could be relevant for our EJ plan:

Champaign County Community Health Plan 2021-2023

• Champaign Public Health Department conducted 4 assessments, 2 of the following contained engagement with residents
  
  • Survey 634 community residents about strengths and weaknesses of the community – identified mental health, child abuse, gun violence, and infectious disease as top health concerns
  • 25 community leaders from different agencies brainstormed about major threats/opportunities that they perceived with various issues and filled out a survey. Some issues include climate change, Mahomet Aquifer threatened by Clinton landfill, toxic waste disposal, drought
• Appendix includes all surveys used
• Useful maps showcasing racial diversity and other important demographics

Storm Water Management Plan

• Identified their own EJ areas
• Contains survey about storm-water specific issues

Champaign County Soil and Water Conservation District

• Currently soliciting feedback through customer survey here
• May be useful for phrasing questions about environmental services

Urbana Comprehensive Plan

• Ongoing engagement survey for Urbana’s new Comprehensive Plan, suggested for EJ by Scott Tess

Here are ideas from the iCAP as it was listed in the Appendix “Acknowledgements for future considerations” that may be relevant for EJ:

1. 1. Reduce pollution in Boneyard Creek
   2. Identify places of heavy erosion, such as channel buffers and farms
   3. Implement curbside food and lawn waste pickup program for UC community to decrease per-household garbage volume
   4. Reduce mowing by 10% by 2022 to increase natural areas

5. Start conversations with other community members about EJ

Other than the Resilience iCAP Team and the EJ Committee, Meredith and I met with the following community members about EJ: 

Gabe Lewis (Planner at CCRPC)

• Reached out through email and made him aware of EJ Plan efforts

Jessica Lehmkuhl, James Corbin II (Sustainability Advisory Commission)

• Met over Zoom, SAC is open to collaboration and want to be a part of our plan

Cassie Carroll 

Met over Zoom about Cassie’s expertise in interviews/focus groups. The following are notes from our discussion:

• Suggested for us to reach out to Dr. Robin Jarrett (rjarrett@illinois.edu) at UIC who has experience in Human Dimensions to develop training for interviewer and more
• Told us that charettes (multi-day interviews/workshops) had been conducted in Washington Street Basin (possible follow-up item for us)
• Start with organizations we’re friendly with who have a broach reach and start base building
• Need to clarify how we will follow up with people after interviews and how much they want to be involved 
• We should get buy-in from groups so they can actively participate in what we’re working on
• Possibly incentivize focus group participation through offering lunch etc.
• Recommended having person from community to lead focus groups, but they will need training
• They had 7 people actively working at her job where they worked with Ameren to understand how people could be more connected to energy-efficiency jobs

Moving Forward…

In this section, I will summarize what I had hoped to accomplish this summer, why we weren’t able to do so, and questions to consider as the EJ Plan moves forward.

Initially, I had planned to conduct focus groups this summer and analyze the results. However, after discussions with Meredith and the EJ Committee, we decided to delay the focus groups until we had more thorough knowledge about the best way to conduct them. The following are questions we have in mind, but aren’t sure how to proceed. 

1. Scope of the EJ Plan

1. What is the geographic range of the EJ plan? 
2. The iCAP cites the urbanized areas of Champaign, Urbana, and Savoy. But since EJ goals may be different from the iCAP goals, how do we define which areas will be included/excluded in the EJ Plan? 

2. Vulnerability Assessments

1. Geography students working for Meredith in Spring 2021 submitted a report that used available data but did not identify specific EJ areas. 
2. EJSCREEN, Solar for All, the previous Storm Water EJ Areas, and the Champaign GIS consortium can all be used. EJSCREEN may be sufficient for identifying vulnerable communities. All data and maps gathered can be found here.

3. Possible funding

1. I researched groups in Illinois that have received Environmental Justice Grants from the EPA. There weren’t very many, but it may be helpful to reach out in the future
   
   1. Metropolitan Tenants Organization (MTO) “Chicago Healthy Homes Inspection Collaborative” (2016)
   2. Legal Council for Health Justice “Building Community Capacity to Address Lead Poisoning: Creating a Blueprint for “kNOw LEAD” App Development” (2019)
   3. Center for Neighborhood Technology “Helping the Chatham Neighborhood of Chicago Become Rain Ready” (2015)

4. Ownership of the EJ Committee

1. Everybody on the committee is very passionate, but since they are all volunteering their time and have other commitments, it is sometimes difficult to determine ownership on initiatives. 

This update is also attached as a report and was sent to Stacy Gloss, a member of the Resilience iCAP Team, who will be leading the EJ efforts this Fall. 

CCNet co-hosted the Solar Urbana-Champaign power hour and shared the benefits of joining the CCNet with the people who signed up for the Solar Power Hour.

Thank you to those who participated in the Geothermal Illinois webinar on 7/29! Many thanks to our presenters, Dr. Tugce Baser, Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign; John Freitag, Executive Director, Geothermal Alliance of Illinois; and Dr. Yu-Feng Forrest Lin, Director of Illinois Water Resources Center; Principal Research Hydrogeologist, Prairie Research Institute.

As promised, slides are available for download here, and a recording can be found here.

Other helpful links shared during the program:

• Illinois Geothermal Coalition: https://geothermal.illinois.edu
• Andrew Stumpf (Geothermal Coalition and ISGS): astumpf@illinois.edu
• John Freitag’s presentation for the Geothermal Urbana-Champaign program can be found at https://www.growsolar.org/geothermal-urbana-champaign/
• The Home Energy Efficiency Team (HEET) group is working with utilities in Massachusetts to build a GeoMicroDistrict https://heet.org/2021/05/25/national-grid-proposes-networked-geothermal/ . They gave a presentation recently on the project https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rPy2Dennq4Q

Please join us on August 10 and August 12 for geothermal webinars that will give us a closer look at campus projects and community models.

For more information, please contact: 

Nancy Esarey Ouedraogo
Extension State Specialist, Community and Economic Development
UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS EXTENSION
https://extension.illinois.edu/
905 S Goodwin Ave
557 Bevier Hall MC 184
Urbana, IL 61801
esarey@illinois.edu
217-244-7020

Kimmy Chuang sent the following email to the Environmental Justice Committee, requesting feedback on conducting focus group interviews. The draft questions and contact group documents are attached.

=================================

Hello EJ Committee,

Meredith and I have compiled a draft list of interview questions for small focus groups and we’d like to hear your input. A large number of questions are adapted from the Providence RI Climate Justice Plan -- which you can read here -- as well as other local surveys I’ve researched. 

As mentioned during our last meeting, if you could please (1) approve each question (2) suggest any edits and (3) rank them in terms of priority. The full set of standard questions will be asked to the focus group. On the second page, you’ll find some other questions that we’ve been considering but aren’t sure whether to include as part of this list or only ask if time permits. If you think there is a question missing, please leave a comment. The draft questions can be found here on Box and are attached.

As we’re finalizing these questions, Meredith and I were also thinking of starting to reach out to the people we’d like to interview. We propose hosting five focus groups for each of the constituency groups: Neighborhood Associations, Community Organizations, Government, Social Justice Groups, and Relevant UIUC Advisory Groups/Personnel. We plan to ask for one representative from each entity to attend the focus group interview (see contact list attached).

We’re thinking of sending a Zoom invite for 12-2pm, but do you all think there would be a better time to convene the focus groups? For example, if usually people involved in Social Justice Groups or Neighborhood Associations work during the day, would it make more sense to host their focus group later from 4-6pm? With the interviewee’s consent, we will record these meetings. 

We would love your participation in the interview process as well. We propose two or three of us per focus group interview, though are open to your thoughts. Our suggested dates for the interviews, based on our schedules, are: 

Monday, July 26

Tuesday, July 27 (afternoon only)

Wednesday, July 28 

Thursday, July 29

Friday, July 30

Please send me and Meredith your feedback on our draft list or interview questions and your thoughts on how/when we should convene these focus groups. We request your feedback on the interview questions by next Wednesday, July 14. We would like to contact the groups and send out the Zoom invitations as soon as possible; please send us your availability/thoughts on participating in the interviews by Monday at the latest. 

The News-Gazette printed this story about the geothermal at the Campus Instructional Facility: https://www.news-gazette.com/news/local/university-illinois/renewable-en...

"URBANA — The University of Illinois’ glossy new building at Springfield Avenue and Wright Street represents the next step in its sustainability goals.

The four-story, 122,000- square-foot, $75 million Campus Instructional Facility is also the biggest geothermal installation on the UI campus.

Its geothermal system can pump 135 tons of hot or cool air into the building. That’s twice as much as the next biggest geothermal system on campus, and about 30 times the amount pumped into an average home.

“The whole world knows about solar and wind power and things like that — hydroelectric power, too — but that’s only the electric side of energy. Energy also includes heating and cooling,” said Morgan White, director of sustainability at UI Facilities & Services. “It’s truly transformative, because it’s moving into the phase of getting us clean thermal energy and not just clean electricity.”

Electricity provides heating and cooling as well, she said, but it’s primarily provided by natural gas, propane and other nonrenewable sources of energy.

The key to the geothermal endeavor? Forty boreholes dug into the Bardeen Quad next to Grainger Library. They’re 20 feet apart, 6 inches wide and drilled 450 feet deep.

Initially, the project required 60 boreholes, but UI researchers reduced that figure — and made the system financially feasible — by checking the thermal conductivity of different rock and soil layers, or the rate that heat passes through them, while considering the depth and flow rate of groundwater.

To keep the building temperate year-round, a mixture of water and glycol circulates from a heat pump in the mechanical room into a pipe that runs up and down the underground field of boreholes.

In winter, the pump pulls heat from the ground into the building. In summer, heat is pumped from the building back into the ground.

“It’s like when you have a bathtub that’s a little too hot or a little too cold, and you pour some water in and stir it up,” White said.

In all, the system reduces the building’s energy consumption by 65 percent compared to a typical heating/cooling installation, saving about $45,000 per year.

Student initiatives helped fund the state-of-the-art thermal system. The 18-member Student Sustainability Committee, funded by the annual “Green Fee” assessed on students, allocated $375,000 — or about 13 percent of the system’s cost — to the facility’s geothermal installation.

The building has a number of other unique features. It contains two dozen new classrooms — one of the highest figures on campus — replete with active-learning and distance-learning spaces. In the fall, engineering courses will occupy most of the space, along with math, statistics and other technical classes.

The facility is also the first UI building funded through a public-private partnership, which allows for tax-exempt financing.

Meanwhile, faculty and graduate students will use temperature information from a 385-foot-deep monitoring well, funded by Facilities & Services and the Institute for Sustainability, Energy and Environment, for continued research opportunities. 

As part of the Illinois Climate Action Plan, the university plans to get to net-zero carbon emissions by 2050.

Currently, around 12 percent of electricity is provided by renewable sources, like the solar and wind farms near campus, White said. But only 4.5 percent of the UI’s total energy use, counting thermal, comes from renewable sources.

“Clean electricity is important, but it’s not enough,” White said.

In the planning stages, the UI wasn’t supposed to start implementing geothermal systems until 2035, but a suggestion by Yu-Feng Forrest Lin of the Prairie Research Institute jump-started that process."